Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD
Résumé : Inorganic arsenic is an environmental human carcinogen, but is also studied these days because of its potential effectiveness in curing chronic inflammatory disease. Indeed, this metalloid possesses immunosuppressive properties which can dysregulate physiological mechanisms involved in immune defense, or reduce inflammation associated with those inflammatory diseases. Inorganic arsenic is known mainly to alter functions of T cells and macrophages. However, it is unknown whether arsenic targets dendritic cells (DCs). Yet, this antigen presenting cells plays a major role in the immunosurveillance, and is involved in the physiopathology of chronic inflammatory diseases. So, the aim of my thesis work was to study the effects of inorganic arsenic on in vitro differenciation and maturation of dendritic cells from human monocytes. Our results mainly shows that concentrations corresponding to those measured in environmentally exposed people, inhibits DCs secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, which plays a major role in activation and polarization of T cells. Particularly, arsenic strongly impairs expression and secretion of interleukine 12 (IL-12) by an underlying molecular mechanism involving Nrf2. Finally, this work shows that inorganic arsenic has immunosuppressive properties on the physiology in vitro of human dendritic cells. Immunotoxicity may then contribute to the metalloid toxicity in environmentally exposed people. This element could be taken into account when determining arsenic effects in curing some chronic inflammatory diseases.
L’arsenic inorganique est un contaminant environnemental, cancérogène pour l’homme, mais également un métalloïde étudié, aujourd’hui, dans le traitement de maladies inflammatoires chroniques. Il possède des propriétés immunosuppressives pouvant déréguler les mécanismes physiologiques de défense ou bloquer l’exacerbation de réponses inflammatoires chroniques. L’arsenic inorganique altère principalement les fonctions des lymphocytes T et des macrophages. En revanche, l’impact du métalloïde sur la physiologie des cellules dendritiques (DCs) est peu connu. Pourtant, ces cellules présentatrices d’antigène jouent un rôle fondamental dans les processus d’immunosurveillance et sont très impliquées dans la physiopathologie des maladies inflammatoires chroniques. Dans ce contexte, les objectifs de mon travail de thèse étaient d’étudier les effets de l’arsenic inorganique sur la différenciation et la maturation in vitro de DCs générées à partir de monocytes humains. Nos résultats démontrent principalement que des concentrations de métalloïde, compatibles avec les taux plasmatiques d’arsenic mesurés chez les individus exposés, répriment la capacité des DCs à sécréter différentes cytokines pro-inflammatoires jouant un rôle essentiel dans l’activation et la polarisation des lymphocytes T. En particulier, l’arsenic inhibe l’expression et la sécrétion de l’interleukine-12 par un mécanisme moléculaire impliquant le facteur de transcription Nrf2. Au total, ces travaux de thèse démontrent que l’arsenic inorganique possède des propriétés immunosuppressives sur la physiologie in vitro des DCs humaines. Cette immunotoxicité pourrait contribuer à la toxicité du métalloïde chez l’homme exposé par voie environnementale, et être prise en compte pour déterminer les effets de l’arsenic dans le traitement de certaines maladies inflammatoires chroniques
https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01135887

NNT : 2013REN1B013
tel-01135887
https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01135887
https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01135887/document
https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01135887/file/pdf2star-1392896105-Th--se-M--linda-Macoch2.pdf

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD Landes Bioscience
Résumé : International audience
In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.
Autophagy

hal-00735751
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00735751
PUBMED : 22966490

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD Nature Publishing Group
Résumé : International audience
Necroptosis is a programmed cell death pathway that has been shown to be of central pathophysiological relevance in multiple disorders (hepatitis, brain and cardiac ischemia, pancreatitis, viral infection and inflammatory diseases). Necroptosis is driven by two serine threonine kinases, RIPK1 (Receptor Interacting Protein Kinase 1) and RIPK3, and a pseudo-kinase MLKL (Mixed Lineage Kinase domain-Like) associated in a multi-protein complex called necrosome. In order to find new inhibitors for use in human therapy, a chemical library containing highly diverse chemical structures was screened using a cell-based assay. The compound 6E11, a natural product derivative, was characterized as a positive hit. Interestingly, this flavanone compound: inhibits necroptosis induced by death receptors ligands TNF-α (Tumor Necrosis Factor) or TRAIL (TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand); is an extremely selective inhibitor, among kinases, of human RIPK1 enzymatic activity with a nM Kd; has a non-ATP competitive mode of action and a novel putative binding site; is weakly cytotoxic towards human primary blood leukocytes or retinal pigment epithelial cells at effective concentrations; protects human aortic endothelial cells (HAEC) from cold hypoxia/reoxygenation injury more effectively than necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) and Nec-1s. Altogether, these data demonstrate that 6E11 is a novel potent small molecular inhibitor of RIPK1-driven necroptosis.
ISSN: 2045-2322

hal-01616456
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01616456
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01616456/document
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01616456/file/s41598-017-12788-4.pdf
DOI : 10.1038/s41598-017-12788-4